Sunday, 12 October 2014

What are Never Events?

The term ‘never event’ was first introduced in 2001 by Ken Kizer, former chief executive of the National Quality Forum in the United States, in reference to particularly shocking medical errors that should never occur.


Over time, the term has been expanded to signify adverse events that are unambiguous (clearly identifiable and measurable), serious (resulting in death or significant disability), and usually preventable if the available measures have been implemented by healthcare providers.


The information from the United States indicates that the use of the term and its associated focus has improved safety.


In the UK the term was introduced in April 2009, following Lord Darzi’s proposal in High Quality Care for All. The original list consisted of the following:


  1. Wrong site surgery 

  2. Retained instrument post-operation (includes swabs and throat packs)

  3. Wrong route administration of chemotherapy

  4. Misplaced naso or orogastric tube not detected prior to use

  5. In-hospital maternal death from post-partum haemorrhage after caesarean section

  6. Inpatient suicide using non-collapsible rails

  7. Escape from within the secure perimeter of medium or high secure mental health services by patients who are transferred prisoners

  8. Intravenous administration of mis-selected concentrated potassium chloride.

To be a never event, an incident must fulfil the following criteria:


  • It has clear potential for, or has caused severe harm or death.

  • There is evidence that it has occurred in the past (ie, it is a known source of risk).

  • There is existing national guidance or safety recommendations on how it can be prevented and there is support for implementing these.

  • It can be easily defined, identified and continually measured.

Serious events (including never events) are assessed and categorised as grade 1 or 2, depending on the seriousness of the event. They should all be reported to the primary care trust (or clinical commissioning group), as well as the National Reporting and Learning Service (NRLS – at Imperial College), with never events being specified in the free text field. Since the summer, reports should also be made to the Strategic Executive Information System.


Although such events are reported to CQC and Monitor through the NRLS, it is much better if they are reported directly to CQC (and Monitor for foundation trusts and the NHS Trust Development Authority for non-foundation trusts). Serious events are investigated and shared with the PCT and an action plan shared widely to improve the service.


CQC may use information on never events to inform our regulatory processes, alongside other indicators, and we may take enforcement action.


In the first year of reporting, there were 111 never events. Of these, 57 were due to wrong site surgery, and 41 due to misplaced nasogastric tubes. There were no events due to wrong route administration of chemotherapy, in-hospital maternal death from post-partum haemorrhage after elective caesarean section, and inpatient suicide using non-collapsible rails. The remainder were under 10 events.


We would all agree that the national reporting system is in dire need of revision to ensure that it becomes a true national learning experience.


There has been a recent review of never events and the list extended to the following:


  1. Wrong site surgery

  2. Wrong implant/prosthesis

  3. Retained foreign object post-operation

  4. Wrongly prepared high-risk injectable medication

  5. Maladministration of potassium-containing solutions

  6. Wrong route administration of chemotherapy

  7. Wrong route administration of oral/enteral treatment

  8. Intravenous administration of epidural medication

  9. Maladministration of insulin

  10. Overdose of midazolam during conscious sedation

  11. Opioid overdose of an opioid-naïve patient

  12. Inappropriate administration of daily oral methotrexate

  13. Suicide using non-collapsible rails

  14. Escape of a transferred prisoner

  15. Falls from unrestricted windows

  16. Entrapment in bedrails

  17. Transfusion of ABO-incompatible blood components

  18. Transplantation of ABO-incompatible organs as a result of error

  19. Misplaced naso- or oro-gastric tubes

  20. Wrong gas administered

  21. Failure to monitor and respond to oxygen saturation

  22. Air embolism

  23. Misidentification of patients

  24. Severe scalding of patients

  25. Maternal death due to post partum haemorrhage after elective Caesarean section.

The bolded ones would be more appropriate for the Emergency Department.


Input from CQC



What are Never Events?

Saturday, 27 September 2014

The FCEM Management Viva - The Basics





The Management Viva


Total of 35min

There is a structured marking grid with ideal Answers

The pass mark is 60-65%


The aim is to assess:


  • Ability to prioritise and time manage

  • Decision making

  • Delegation

  • Communication Skills

  • Medico-legal awareness

  • Governance

  • Ethics & Probity

  • Managing your staff

  • Recognising educational opportunities

  • Knowledge of complaints and disciplinary procedure

Common Themes


  • Complaints

  • Doctors with difficulties

  • Freedom of information

  • Staffing issues

  • SUIs /Adverse events

  • Policy Declarations from other departments

The In Tray


  • 5 minutes Reading time

  • 15 minutes viva

  • Usually maximum of 9 items

  • Consists of your Diary Card, Letters, memos, emails

  • The first 5 minutes is the most important make sure you read everything, and sort them in order of priority

  • Write post it notes of key bits. You can also write or underline on the exam papers.

  • You get marks for talking about everything in the in tray even the fillers

  • Diary Card is the most important as it gives details of your department and offers ways to link things in for extra marks

  • Keep it in front of you

Starting the Viva


  • Check the department first – if it is melt down then everything else waits.

  • Do I have a clinic or a ward round?

  • Can a middle-grade start it?

  • What meetings do I have? When are they? Who will be there?

  • Do they tie into anything in my box?









Structure of answers


  • Have structure to your answers. The following headings might help.

  • Always talk about information gathering and how you going to do that. (Patient’s notes, statement from staff, CCTV, IT records, etc)

  • Patient issues – Is the patient safe now? Was the treatment/management appropriate?

  • Staffing issues – Are there any staff member affected and how? Don’t forget about the pastoral care.

  • Short term solutions – Junior doctor teaching session, removing sharps and putting appropriate sharp bins, etc.

  • Long term solutions – Making formal policy or pathway.





Prioritising your In Tray


Three levels of priority:


  1. Important and time dependant – You need to sort out now

  2. Important but not time dependant – You can sort out later

  3. Neither important nor time dependant

Tell the examiners how you have done this.


Marking and Scoring Well


  • Remember that it is a fixed scheme with ideal answers, every piece in your in- tray carries marks, but value varies (2-12)

  • Spend more time on complicated ones

  • Score higher by finding the tie ups to diary and other items in the In-Tray

  • Be decisive – don’t sit on the fence

  • Mention the links and tie ins

  • “I’d like to check on the patient”

  • Delegate appropriately

  • Secure copies of notes and documents

  • Take minutes of important meetings

  • Empathise with the situation

  • Address the issues

  • Use guidelines

  • Know the organisations who can help – CQC, NPSA, NCAS etc

  • Know the processes at your trust – download and read your policies



The common pitfalls are:

Sounding like you have just learnt off the answer

Not touching on all parts of the in-tray

Not moving on in a timely manner

Arguing with the examiners

The Long Case


  • More difficult to predict

  • Complex multifaceted case

  • Once you look up from reading it they will start quizzing you

On the day of the Vivas


  • Dress if going for an interview.

  • Lots of hanging about on this day.

  • Be calm.

  • Time is short, so make good use of it

  • Read all the papers and have something to say about each of them

  • If the examiners try to move you on then let them

  • Don’t look up from the long case until you have read it all

  • Don’t get aggressive.

  • Be polite

With input from London FCEM Course







The FCEM Management Viva - The Basics

Thursday, 4 September 2014

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)

Ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most serious consequence of induction of ovulation. It may occur after stimulation of the ovaries into superovulation with drugs such as human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) and human menopausal gonadotrophin. It is rare with clomifene except in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).


Grades and associated clinical features:


Mild OHSS


  • Abdominal bloating.

  • Mild abdominal pain.

  • Ovarian size usually <8 cm.

Moderate OHSS


  • Moderate abdominal pain.

  • Nausea ± vomiting.

  • Ultrasound evidence of ascites.

  • Ovarian size usually 8-12 cm.

Severe OHSS


  • Clinical ascites (occasionally hydrothorax).

  • Oliguria.

  • Haemoconcentration haematocrit >45%.

  • Hypoproteinaemia.

  • Ovarian size usually >12 cm.

Critical OHSS


  • Tense ascites or large hydrothorax.

  • Haematocrit >55%.

  • White cell count >25 x 109/L.

  • Oligo-anuria.

  • Thromboembolism.

  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Risk factors:


  • Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) greatly increases the risk.

  • Younger women are at greater risk.

  • High oestrogen levels and a large number of follicles.

  • The use of hCG for luteal phase support.

  • Administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist.


Presentation:


  • Symptoms usually appear 4 or 5 days after harvesting of eggs.

  • There is abdominal pain and distension due to accumulation of fluid.

  • In 1 or 2% of cases with very enlarged ovaries, the patient is ill with severe pain, nausea and vomiting.

  • There may also be pleural effusions with fluid passing from the abdomen into the pleural cavity.

Investigations:


  • Ultrasound of the ovaries and abdomen for fluid. A possible risk in this condition is torsion of the ovary and ultrasound scan may suggest this.

  • FBC,as there may be haemoconcentration. (Serious findings are haematocrit above 45% and white cell count above 15 x 109/L.)

  • U&E and creatinine, as renal function may be impaired. (Serious findings are sodium below 135 mmol/L or potassium above 5.0 mmol/L.)

  • Coagulation screen.

  • LFTs.

  • CXR and lateral (to assess any pleural effusion).

Management:


In mild cases:

Analgesia and increased oral fluids will suffice. The condition will settle rapidly unless pregnancy occurs, when it will take longer to subside.
In moderate cases:

Admission to hospital for thromboprophylaxis and monitoring may be judicious.
Severe cases:

These require very careful monitoring of fluid balance:


  • An initial bolus of a litre of fluid intravenously (IV) should be followed by enough to maintain urine output of 30 to 40 ml an hour.

  • A diuretic should be given if urine output is inadequate.

  • Aspiration of ascites or pleural effusion can relieve symptoms.

  • Albumin may be given to replace circulating volume and it may need to be given periodically:

  • Clear guidance on the management of the acute, severe condition is not available but each aspect is tackled as required and intensive care may be required.




Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)

Monday, 30 June 2014

CAP 6: Breathlessness

1. Spontaneous Pneumothorax


By definition spontaneous pneumothoraces occur in the absence of any trauma (including iatrogenic causes) to the chest wall.


  • Primary spontaneous pneumothoraces occur in people with no underlying lung pathology.

  • Secondary spontaneous pneumothoraces occur in patients with pre-existing lung parenchymal or pleural pathology (e.g. asthma, lung carcinoma).

All patients with secondary pneumothoraces should be admitted and, unless specifically contraindicated, be given high concentration oxygen. Administration of oxygen at 15 l/min via a non-rebreathe mask will increase the rate of resolution of the pneumothorax by 4 times compared to breathing room air.


BTS Pneumothorax Flowchart


Advice to patient if discharged from the ED with small primary pneumothorax


  • Stop smoking (if smoker) and to seek help from his GP to do this. The risk of recurrence will be much higher should he continue to smoke.

  • To return to the ED for a repeat chest radiograph and senior doctor review after 2 weeks, or sooner if he becomes more breathless. Although it would be preferable for him to see a respiratory specialist, it may be impossible to access specialist clinics in the recommended timeframe. But, in some Trusts they have arrangement to see chest specialists early. 

  • Avoid flying for at least a week after a chest radiograph has confirmed complete resolution of his pneumothorax (BTS Air Travel Working Party)

  • To avoid underwater diving permanently unless he has bilateral open surgical pleurectomy (The British Thoracic Society Fitness to Dive Group)

BTS. Pleural disease, 2010.

BTS. Pleural disease, 2010.


BTS. Air travel recommendations, 2011

BTS. Air travel recommendations, 2011


BTS. Emergency oxygen use in adult patients, 2008.

BTS. Emergency oxygen use in adult patients, 2008.



CAP 6: Breathlessness

The College of Emergency Medicine - Curriculum

The College of Emergency Medicine has published the curriculum in 2010 and it was revised in 30th May 2012. It’s a good idea to know what college expect from the trainee during the exam process.


The major clinical presentation starts from the page 111.



Download (PDF, 2.82MB)



The College of Emergency Medicine - Curriculum

Tuesday, 17 June 2014

Management Viva - Complaint related documents

The following documents are freely available in the internet which I found important for the understanding of NHS complaints.


Few important points to remember:


  • Time frame to make a complaint is one year.

  • The acknowledgement of a formal complain should be sent out within 3 days.

  • If complaint comes directly to the department, it should be diverted to the Complaint Manager.

  • Complaint Manager in most NHS Trust are located in PALS

  • Investigating officer (nominated ED consultant) will draft a formal response after gathering available information mentioned in the complaint.

  • The formal response will be typed and then signed by Chief Executive and send out to the complainant.

  • The time frame of the formal response will depend on the complexity of the case.

  • If the complainant is happy, it will stop there. And if not happy with the process they will have to contact Health Service Ombudsman.

  • The Health Service Ombudsman will review the case before accepting.

1. Clinical Negligence Litigation: A very brief guide for clinicians


NHS LA Document

NHS LA Document



2. Department of Health guidance on NHS Complaints


A Guide to Better Customer Care

A Guide to Better Customer Care


Dealing with serious complaints

Dealing with serious complaints



3. MPS Series on Complaints


NHS Complaints in England: Regulations and Principles

NHS Complaints in England: Regulations and Principles


Complaints: FAQ

Complaints: FAQ


4. MDU Series on Complaints


Introduction

Introduction


Local Resolution

Local Resolution


Writing a Response

Writing a Response


Health Service Ombudsman

Health Service Ombudsman



5. Procedure for Investigation and Resolving Complaints


The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust



This document is slightly older but gives a good overview of hospital complaints process.


The time frame for complaints is 12months now.


The time frame for sending out acknowledgement letter in response to a complaint is 3 days.



Download (DOC, 64KB)





6. NHS Complaints Procedures in England


Information for the Member of Parliament

Information for the Member of Parliament



Management Viva - Complaint related documents

Doctors in Difficulty - Drugs and Alcohol

A reasonable number of trainees can become ill during training: of these, most have a psychiatric or stress-related problem. Many can be ill for some time, & either not recognised that they were ill or decided against reporting this. A small number use drugs or alcohol.


There are several things to consider. Immediate patient safety must come first; a person currently under the influence of drugs or alcohol must be removed from the clinical situation.


Once this is done, & assuming the person is sober enough to talk, it’s important to find somewhere appropriate to hold a confidential conversation. As I’m doing this, I run through a mental check-list: what would it be like to be this doctor, who is the best person to have this conversation, what skills must I demonstrate, & what practicalities need sorting out?


What it would be like to be the doctor in difficulty?:
In most circumstances, doctors who abuse drugs or alcohol have begun the habit as a coping strategy because of stress or illness. Doctors who are ill, particularly those with psychological or stress-related illness are concerned about being stigmatised. They describe a feeling of shame, of letting themselves down by not meeting their own high personal standards, worries about confidentiality & loss of control & fears about damage to their livelihood because of disciplinary action or referral to the General Medical Council (GMC). Particular concerns for those in training grades are that they may lose the respect of others, & that disclosing a mental illness, especially alcohol or drug use, may threaten their career & job prospects. So the person is being very brave in talking at all. He or she will have mentally rehearsed this situation many times & reached the conclusion that it’s safer to say nothing about his or her problem. Even if the person wanted to talk, deciding who to tell is difficult.


Who is best to have this conversation?:
It is important that the doctor speaks to someone he or she respects & trusts to keep the matter as confidential as possible. So I ask “You need to talk to someone about this. Should this be me or is there someone else you would prefer to talk to?” I offer the trainee the option of bringing someone with them. Sometimes, but in my experience rarely, they will want to.


What skills must I demonstrate?:
The conversation will only be useful if the trainee feels that the conversation is confidential & he or she is being treated with respect, empathy & genuineness. I need to make sure I demonstrate these qualities, not just feel them. I start with a comment such as “We need to talk about what’s happened, & how you are. The most important thing we need to do is explore & understand what’s going on from your perspective.” The first thing I do is to listen. It might seem a rather weak response when you have a hundred questions going round in your head. But just listening actively to everything the person says, summarising & being sure to notice the trainee’s feelings & reflect them back accurately, is likely to achieve most. You’re not the person’s doctor – you don’t need to know what substances, how often, where or when.


Caught in the act, most people acknowledge events. Those who refute what is described or deny their involvement are almost always using a coping strategy of putting blame on others or on circumstances; they know they’ve got a problem but don’t feel safe to talk about it. If this happens, I start by explaining what I saw or has been reported to me as having occurred, outline what happens to doctors with drug & alcohol problems & what we are required to do to meet governance & GMC requirements. I also make clear that they are not alone, & that many colleagues who have found themselves in this sort of difficulty return to work &/or to training. There are a number of services for doctors with health difficulties & for doctors with drug & alcohol problems* & I make sure the trainee is made aware of these.


What practicalities need sorting?


Three aspects need to be managed; the doctor’s health & treatment, governance, & informing those who need to know that a trainee has a drug or alcohol problem. 


Health & treatment:


The outcome I aim for is that the trainee gets to the right services to treat & support them, but in a way that preserves his or her dignity & keeps the details of his or her situation as confidential as possible. Treatment of their underlying problem might be achieved through their GP, via the consultant occupational physician or through direct contact with the local drug & alcohol service. As many such people have an underlying illness which also needs treatment, a consultation with the GP can be helpful. However there are a group of doctors for whom the GP is a family friend, or part of a social, ethnic or religious community, when the problem of disclosure & potential stigma can be a significant barrier.


If there is a good Occupational Physician in the Trust or available via the Deanery, it is very useful for the trainee to see this person. It is the responsibility of the Occupational Physician to advise the trainee, Trust & Deanery as to whether the doctor is well enough to continue working & if so, what adjustments are needed to their duties or working pattern. In practical terms this usually means the doctor is “given permission to be ill”, & to take time away from work to address the underlying causes of their problem as well as their drug or alcohol usage. If the doctor is well enough to remain at work in some capacity, the Occupational Physician acts as the doctor’s advocate in making sure the duties &/or training requirements expected of a trainee are realistic in the context of their health difficulties. The Occupational Physician may also refer them on to the appropriate clinician (often a psychiatrist) & to the drug & alcohol service, as they will know which doctors are used to treating fellow professionals.


Governance:


The GMC requires every doctor to:


  • Act without delay if you have good reason to believe that you or a colleague may be putting patients at risk.

  • Consult a suitably qualified colleague if your judgement or performance could be affected by a condition or its treatment & ask for & follow their advice about investigations, treatment & changes to your practice that they consider necessary.

In practice, this means that every doctor has a responsibility to remove a colleague from the immediate clinical situation if the doctor is under the influence of drugs or alcohol. The doctor him or herself must not put patients at risk, & must consult & follow the advice of the Occupational Physician, their GP & the consultant who treats them as a patient.


When identified, matters relating to ill-health or to substance misuse should be dealt with through employers’ occupational health processes & outside disciplinary procedures where possible. Thus, the Trust in which a trainee works & the Deanery in whose programme he or she is training both have a responsibility to provide the trainee with the means to get treated & to address their tendency to use drugs or alcohol as a coping strategy.


In the medium term, the Trust & Deanery should support the trainee in returning to work, & returning to training, once they are well enough. Many such situations fall under the disability discrimination act, which places a duty on employers to make ‘adjustments’, such as to working hours, place of work or by modifying procedures for assessment. Again this is something for which the advice of a consultant Occupational Physician is important.


Who else will need to know?


The Postgraduate Dean, Trust Medical Director & Clinical Director will need to know of the trainee’s drug or alcohol problem because of their accountability for patient safety, & the GMC must be informed because of its fitness to practice responsibilities. I find this part of the discussion quite tricky to phrase well & introduce at the right time. If the earlier conversation has gone well, & I have managed to demonstrate respect, concern & empathy with the trainee, trust should be starting to develop between us. But this is often tenuous & can be easily broken. By introducing the need to inform those responsible for patient safety & fitness to practice too early in the conversation, I might add to their feelings of embarrassment & disgrace.


Sometimes this is too much of a challenge & the trainee resists. The worry for me is that, quite often, the underlying reason for the drug or alcohol use is depression, & further disempowerment could have dire consequences. Doctors with psychiatric conditions & particularly those who use drugs or alcohol describe feelings of shame at not meeting their own high standards & humiliation at being found out, & unfortunately, faced with discovery, there is the possibility of self-harm or suicide.


On the other hand, if the trainee can be brave enough to seek the help they need & to inform someone senior in the Trust & the Deanery, then this is likely to set them on a better footing. They can then be seen as someone who has taken ownership of their problem, & is doing something about it. If the trainee is known to be seeking & complying with treatment, & using appropriate support, this will also stand them in better stead with the GMC.


When discussing the trainee’s health with third parties, I myself, the Clinical Director, Medical Director, Postgraduate Dean & GMC must each provide the same standard of confidentiality as is afforded to patients. The trainee must not become the subject of corridor gossip or the matter discussed where you can be overheard.


The GMC guidance on confidentiality makes clear that expressed consent must be sought if details about the trainee’s health are disclosed to third parties, unless the disclosure is required by law or can be justified in the public interest. Such disclosures should be kept to a minimum. The trainee must have access to or copies of information exchanged about them & be informed about how information will be used. In practical terms this means that informing the Clinical Director & Medical Director that the trainee has a health issue, is possibly not well enough to work & has told you that he or she has been using drugs or alcohol, is in the public interest, but saying that the doctor is depressed & binge drinking is not, unless the trainee has consented to revealing this information.


The situation is slightly different if the trainee has been arrested for drunk driving or has been obtaining drugs fraudulently by self-prescribing. Both of these are illegal activities which should be disclosed to those in authority.


The GMC will need to be informed at an appropriate point if the doctor has a drug or alcohol problem. The psychiatrist from the drug & alcohol service is often best placed to do this, as they have a better understanding of the clinical picture.


Information about health can be disclosed to the GMC without the trainee’s consent, but the trainee must be informed as to what the GMC is told, even though their consent is not required. When a doctor is arrested or cautioned on a drink driving charge, or has been caught self-prescribing opiates or benzodiazepines by a pharmacist, the Police automatically inform the GMC.


So how do I pick my way through this minefield? I explain that the Medical Director, Clinical Director & GMC will need to know that the trainee has a health problem. Sometimes I find it useful to look together at the GMCs “Good Medical Practice” guidance. If the trainee is feeling brave enough, we draw up an e-mail or letter together, so that the trainee has control over what is said about his or her own health, or we ask the Clinical Director if we can meet urgently in private. When the trainee is too uncertain to inform the Clinical & Medical Director straight away, I ensure that they do not go back to clinical work & they “go off sick”. I arrange to meet them again in the next few days, to agree how we ensure those in authority are informed, & gently point out that, if they don’t turn up, I would still have to tell the Clinical & Medical Director, & Postgraduate Dean & would send them a copy of what I had said. I am lucky in that I can offer the opportunity of talking to someone else who has been in similar circumstances, as some of the many trainees whom I have managed & supported with psychological or stress-related illness, & some with drug or alcohol problems, are willing to share their own experiences.


Many doctors who abuse drugs or alcohol have started the habit as a coping strategy because of other difficulties. If treated fairly & with respect & empathy, many will address their difficulties & get back to safe, effective practice. So first impressions count; a thoughtfully conducted initial discussion can be the gateway the doctor needs to taking ownership of the problem & addressing their difficulties. Any lastly, these are difficult conversations, so do get support for yourself from someone with the skills to help you reflect confidentially about your performance.


Photo courtesy [http://www.generationnext.com.au/]

Doctors in Difficulty - Drugs and Alcohol